Qubo
Qubo Smart 360° 3MP Model 2.0
₹2,499
TP-Link
TP-Link Tapo C225
₹3,499
An in-depth comparison to help you choose the right wifi security camera for your needs.
Price gap
₹1,000
Score gap
11 pts
Rating gap
0.3
Prices accurate as of 07/03/2026. Prices and availability on Amazon.in may change.
Editor's analysis
A hand-written take on how these two compare in the real world.
The TP-Link Tapo C225 at Rs 3,499 faces the upgraded Qubo Smart 360 3MP Model 2.0 at Rs 2,499. The Rs 1,000 gap is more reasonable than some comparisons, but the C225's 4MP QHD Starlight sensor still outperforms the Qubo's 3MP NightPulse in both resolution and night vision quality. The Qubo Model 2.0 brings design refinements and improved build quality over the base Qubo, making it a more compelling mid-range option. For Indian buyers in the Rs 2,000-3,500 range, this matchup represents the tightest decision in the premium segment.
Round by round
How each product stacks up across the key dimensions.
Product A
Qubo Smart 360° 3MP Model 2.0
1
wins
Product B
TP-Link Tapo C225
4
wins
₹2,499
₹3,499
4.3 / 5
4.6 / 5
82/100
93/100
2,100 reviews
Popular
3MP (2K) 2304x1296p
4MP (2K QHD) 2560x1440p
360° horizontal pan/tilt
360° horizontal, Starlight sensor
Quick summary
The TP-Link Tapo C225 at Rs 3,499 faces the upgraded Qubo Smart 360 3MP Model 2.0 at Rs 2,499.
The Tapo C225 remains the better camera for Rs 1,000 more, with 4MP Starlight outperforming 3MP NightPulse. But the Qubo Model 2.0 at Rs 2,499 is the best premium alternative for buyers who want upgraded build quality and Indian brand support without paying the full C225 premium.
Side by side
Each pick at a glance, what they include and what they cost.
Qubo
Resolution
3MP (2K) 2304x1296p
Field of View
360° horizontal pan/tilt
Night Vision Range
NightPulse enhanced vision
Storage
microSD up to 256GB + Cloud
TP-Link
Resolution
4MP (2K QHD) 2560x1440p
Field of View
360° horizontal, Starlight sensor
Night Vision Range
Color night vision up to 9m
Storage
microSD up to 512GB + Cloud
Prices accurate as of 07/03/2026. Prices and availability on Amazon.in may change.
What sets them apart
The decisions you are actually making when you pick one over the other.
The Qubo Smart 360° 3MP Model 2.0 is 29% more affordable, saving you ₹1,000. Both are within a similar price range.
With 4.6 stars from 3,200 reviews, the TP-Link Tapo C225 has stronger customer satisfaction. The large number of reviews makes this rating highly reliable.
The TP-Link Tapo C225 leads in resolution with 4MP (2K QHD) 2560x1440p compared to 3MP (2K) 2304x1296p.
Spec sheet
Side-by-side numbers with subtle highlighting on the stronger value.
| Specification | Qubo Smart 360° 3MP Model 2.0 | TP-Link Tapo C225 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ₹2,499 | ₹3,499 |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5(2,100) | 4.6 / 5(3,200) |
| Resolution | 3MP (2K) 2304x1296p | 4MP (2K QHD) 2560x1440p |
| Field of View | 360° horizontal pan/tilt | 360° horizontal, Starlight sensor |
| Night Vision Range | NightPulse enhanced vision | Color night vision up to 9m |
| Storage | microSD up to 256GB + Cloud | microSD up to 512GB + Cloud |
| Connectivity | WiFi 2.4GHz | WiFi 2.4GHz |
| Two-Way Audio | Yes, built-in mic & speaker | Yes, built-in mic & speaker |
| Power Supply | 5V/2A USB-C | 5V/2A USB-C |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
Highlighted cells indicate the stronger value in that row.
Strengths and tradeoffs
Where each pick shines, and where you'll have to compromise.
Decision guide
Pick the one that matches your priorities, not the spec sheet.
Choose
Qubo Smart 360° 3MP Model 2.0
If you want
Choose
TP-Link Tapo C225
If you want
Buying tip
The Qubo Model 2.0 sits in a sweet spot between budget and premium. If you feel the base Qubo 3MP at Rs 1,990 is too basic but the Tapo C225 at Rs 3,499 is too expensive, the Model 2.0 at Rs 2,499 is a well-positioned middle ground with genuine improvements.
Ready to decide?
Quick answers
You get a 4MP sensor versus 3MP (33% more pixels), Starlight hardware-based color night vision versus NightPulse software enhancement, and TP-Link's refined global ecosystem. The image quality difference is noticeable in night recordings and zoomed-in footage.
The Model 2.0 offers design refinements and improved build quality at a Rs 509 premium over the base model. Core specs (3MP 2K, 360-degree, NightPulse) remain the same. If build quality and design matter, the upgrade is reasonable. Otherwise, the base model offers better value.
Both are indoor cameras not rated for outdoor use. In humid Indian monsoon conditions, neither should face issues in a normal room. Avoid placing either camera near open windows, cooler vents, or in bathrooms where moisture can damage electronics over time.