Philips
Philips HD9378/80
₹2,999
Prestige
Prestige PKOSS 1.5L
₹699
An in-depth comparison to help you choose the right electric kettle for your needs.
Price gap
₹2,300
Score gap
9 pts
Rating gap
0.5
Live Amazon.in prices as of 16/07/2026. Prices and availability may change. Details
Editor's analysis
A hand-written take on how these two compare in the real world.
The Prestige PKOSS 1.5L (Rs 699) and Philips HD9378 Keep Warm (Rs 2,999) sit at opposite ends of the 1.5L kettle market in India. The Philips costs more than four times the Prestige and brings 304 SS double-wall construction, a keep-warm function, and Philips premium quality. The Prestige brings reliable boiling with a faster 1500W element at an entry-level price. This comparison highlights how much the keep-warm feature and premium materials add to the price of what is fundamentally the same task: boiling water.
Round by round
How each product stacks up across the key dimensions.
Product A
Philips HD9378/80
2
wins
Product B
Prestige PKOSS 1.5L
3
wins
₹2,999
₹699
4.4 / 5
3.9 / 5
94/100
85/100
1,876 reviews
Bestseller
1.5 Litres
1.5 Litres
1300W
1500W
Quick summary
The Prestige PKOSS 1.5L (Rs 699) and Philips HD9378 Keep Warm (Rs 2,999) sit at opposite ends of the 1.5L kettle market in India.
The Prestige PKOSS is the rational choice for most Indian households where budget matters and everyone drinks chai at the same time. The Philips HD9378 is a luxury upgrade for families with staggered schedules who will use the keep-warm function daily.
Side by side
Each pick at a glance, what they include and what they cost.
Philips
Capacity
1.5 Litres
Power (Watts)
1300W
Material
304 SS Double Wall
Boiling Time (1L)
4.5 minutes
Prestige
Capacity
1.5 Litres
Power (Watts)
1500W
Material
Stainless Steel
Boiling Time (1L)
4 minutes
Live Amazon.in prices as of 16/07/2026. Prices and availability may change. Details
What sets them apart
The decisions you are actually making when you pick one over the other.
The Prestige PKOSS 1.5L is 77% more affordable, saving you ₹2,300. This is a significant price gap that could be a deciding factor.
With 4.4 stars from 1,876 reviews, the Philips HD9378/80 has stronger customer satisfaction. The large number of reviews makes this rating highly reliable.
The Prestige PKOSS 1.5L leads in power (watts) with 1500W compared to 1300W.
The Prestige PKOSS 1.5L is more efficient in boiling time (1l) with 4 minutes compared to 4.5 minutes.
The Philips HD9378/80 leads in warranty with 2 Years compared to 1 Year.
Spec sheet
Side-by-side numbers with subtle highlighting on the stronger value.
| Specification | Philips HD9378/80 | Prestige PKOSS 1.5L |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ₹2,999 | ₹699 |
| Rating | 4.4 / 5(1,876) | 3.9 / 5(78,124) |
| Capacity | 1.5 Litres | 1.5 Litres |
| Power (Watts) | 1300W | 1500W |
| Material | 304 SS Double Wall | Stainless Steel |
| Boiling Time (1L) | 4.5 minutes | 4 minutes |
| Keep Warm Function | Yes (30 min) | No |
| Auto Cut-Off | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty | 2 Years | 1 Year |
| Weight | 1.15 kg | 0.8 kg |
Highlighted cells indicate the stronger value in that row.
Strengths and tradeoffs
Where each pick shines, and where you'll have to compromise.
Decision guide
Pick the one that matches your priorities, not the spec sheet.
Choose
Philips HD9378/80
If you want
Choose
Prestige PKOSS 1.5L
If you want
Buying tip
If you are considering the Philips HD9378 purely for keep-warm, note that a simple insulated flask (thermos) paired with the Prestige PKOSS can achieve a similar result at a fraction of the cost.
Ready to decide?
Quick answers
Only if you actively use the keep-warm function, need 304 SS for hard water areas, and want double-wall child safety. If you boil and pour immediately, the Prestige does the same job at Rs 699.
The Prestige PKOSS at 1500W actually boils faster than the Philips HD9378 at 1300W. For the same 1.5L volume, the Prestige saves about 1 minute per boil cycle.
Yes, boil water in the Prestige and pour it into a good insulated flask. This keeps water hot for hours, far longer than the Philips' 60-minute keep-warm. It is not as convenient, but much cheaper.